Cornucopia’s Take: Even when Monsanto’s chloroacetanilide herbicide is used correctly by conventional corn and soy farmers, it hangs in the air and can damage oak and hackberry leaves. It can also travel in the atmosphere and come down in rain in non-agricultural areas. This herbicide is not allowed in organic agriculture.
Iowa’s oak trees are sick, and some say farm chemicals are to blame
The Des Moines Register
by Mike Kilen
Iowa’s state tree is under stress. Visible damage to oak trees in recent years may be caused by farm chemicals, forestry experts say.
Nearly a thousand Iowans have contacted the Iowa Department of Natural Resources this spring after noticing the leaves on their oaks appear to be eaten by insects nearly down to the veins, a problem exacerbated this year because of weather fluctuations.
The good news: the trouble isn’t with insects. The bad news: There’s not much you can do about it, unless herbicide applied to corn and soybean fields is stopped, according to a DNR district forester.
“If that chemical was not there, this wouldn’t happen, if you believe the research,” said Mark Vitosh, who is based in Johnson County.
Officials with Monsanto, which makes chloroacetanilide herbicide products cited in studies, said they haven’t received any complaints and weren’t immediately familiar with research on it, so could not comment. Iowa Farm Bureau officials had no comment.
University of Illinois research in 2004 found a “strong correlation” between a condition called leaf tatters and exposure to chloroacetanilide herbicides, particularly in white oaks.
A 2008 study in Iowa by the DNR and Iowa State forestry experts reported that 11 million pounds of acetochlor and metolachlor (both in the chloroacetamide group of herbicides) was applied in Iowa in 2005 and showed similar correlations to oak leaf tatters.
Tivon Feeley, forest health program leader with the DNR, said he is seeing a lot of oak tatters this year because a warm February and a very cold March slowed oak leaf development. The leaves emerged at the same time when the chemicals were at peak ambient levels.
The number of citizen complaints this year is higher than prior years, he said, though not at a record level.
The Iowa DNR reports the problem of oak tatters yearly to the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, which monitors issues with tree health. Officials there say they hear more reports from Iowa than other Midwest states.
The USDA Forest Service lists herbicides as one cause of oak leaf tatters, along with low-temperature injury and insects. Its website specifies that little can be done to prevent additional damage, except to reduce other stresses on the tree and keep it in good health.
Here’s how the damage occurs, according to forestry researchers: When oak leaves emerge in spring, the leaves begin to curl up. Within days, the tissue begins to disappear. The condition correlates with how much chloroacetanilide is in the air. It’s not simply drifting from the applications on fields, but also exists in the atmosphere in areas not adjacent to crop fields, even in cities and towns where tatters have been spotted on trees.
“Then rains can bring it down and, sure enough, you see tatters,” Feeley said.
He said it is not caused from errors in application by farmers.
Leaf tatters most often appear in white oaks, which also include bur and swamp white, and others of Iowa’s 13 oak species. Hackberry trees can also be affected.
Feeley said Illinois, Indiana, and Nebraska are seeing similar issues with tatters this year, and parts of Missouri and Minnesota.
A tree can die if the leaves are damaged over years, but tatters may not be listed as the cause, Vitosh said. Growing secondary leaves to survive takes energy needed as defense against insects or disease.
“In Iowa, we have a significant decline in white oak in the last five, six years,” he said, although he was unable to provide specific numbers. “I’m not saying it’s because of tatters, but that could be part of the problem.”
Don Kruse of rural Oxford says oak tatters are visible in the trees on his 40 acres every year. His property is adjacent to farm fields growing corn and soybeans.
“Everyone tries to slough it off as insect damage and has nothing to do with the herbicide,” he said. “I’ve been a plant enthusiast for 40 years. I know, after farmers spray chemicals, within days, the growth of a variety of trees and shrubs is stagnant, and as the days progress, you see the damage on the oak leaves.”
Kruse is retired and moved from Ohio to buy the acreage in 2008. He lived next to a national park in Ohio and never saw the problem. After moving to Iowa, he looked into what was happening to his oak leaves, and it concerned him on a deeper level.
“It’s a little unsettling to know that it’s all airborne,” he said. “I’m out here in farm country. We can feel it in the air and in our eyes.”
Hackberry trees had widespread damage this year as well, said Jesse Randall, an Iowa State University associate professor and ISU Extension forester.
In the 2008 ISU study, researchers applied the amount of herbicide measurable in the atmosphere, not the higher concentration that may drift from nearby fields during application, to test on oak trees. Oak leaves became tattered.
A follow-up study in 2010 showed that the herbicide also inhibited root growth in several kinds of trees, including some maples, when the diluted amount was applied to young trees.
“It doesn’t have to be applied right to a tree. It’s coming down in rainwater. Long-term, that’s just not good for forest health,” Randall said.
“But nothing will change because it’s such a widely used family of chemicals.”
More research on the long-term effects is vital, because some oak populations are declining, he said. But funding is difficult to find.
It remains a low priority, Feeley said.
“It is considered regional — a few Midwest states — and no one has proven (tree) mortality with it,” he said. “Join that with a shrinking federal budget, and there isn’t enough funding to really look further into this.”