Archive for March, 2011

Farmers and Seed Producers Launch Preemptive Strike against Monsanto

Wednesday, March 30th, 2011

Lawsuit Filed To Protect Themselves from Unfair Patent Enforcement on Genetically Modified Seed

Action Would Prohibit Biotechnology Giant from Suing Organic Farmers and Seed Growers If Innocently Contaminated by Roundup Ready Genes

NEW York: On behalf of 60 family farmers, seed businesses and organic agricultural organizations, the Public Patent Foundation (PUBPAT) filed suit today against Monsanto Company challenging the chemical giant’s patents on genetically modified seed. The organic plaintiffs were forced to sue preemptively to protect themselves from being accused of patent infringement should their crops ever become contaminated by Monsanto’s genetically modified seed.

Monsanto has sued farmers in the United States and Canada, in the past, when their patented genetic material has inadvertently contaminated their crops. Read Full Article »

Bookmark and Share

Two North Carolina Grocers Split on Organic Approach

Thursday, March 24th, 2011

Harris Teeter Accused of “Selling-Out” Values of Movement

DURHAM, NC: North Carolina has been a hotbed of the organic farming movement since it started to achieve commercial success in the 1980s. Now that the industry has grown to almost $28 billion of annual sales, it’s fitting that the state is in the center of a simmering nationwide debate.

For almost 10 years, organic dairy farmers, almost exclusively families with modestly scaled operations, averaging about 60 cows each, have been fighting giant “factory farms,” each milking thousands of cows, which they have accused of producing organic milk without following the rigid federal regulations. Read Full Article »

Bookmark and Share

Industry Watchdog “Dumbfounded” by USDA’s Failure to Enforce Organic Law

Monday, March 21st, 2011

USDA Continues Bush-era Policy of Allowing Unapproved Synthetic Additives

March 21, 2011
For Immediate Release
Contact: Mark Kastel, 608-625-2042
Charlotte Vallaeys, 978-369-6409

Cornucopia, WI—The Cornucopia Institute, one of the nation’s leading organic industry watchdogs, condemned the position of the United States Department of Agriculture that it will allow products containing unapproved synthetic additives to be labeled “organic” for an indefinite grace period.

The Cornucopia Institute had filed legal complaints against infant formula manufacturers and Dean Foods, manufacturer of Horizon dairy products, for adding unapproved additives: Martek Biosciences Corporation’s omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids (DHA/ARA), derived chemically from fermented algae and fungus, to foods with the organic label.

The Cornucopia Institute maintains, and the USDA reiterated in a compliance letter issued March 16, that these additives are illegal in organics. But the USDA also stated it would not take enforcement action at this time. The USDA’s compliance letter suggested that it would allow companies to continue adding the additives to organic foods during a phase-out period of unspecified length, despite its clear statement, in the same letter, that the additives were being used in organics due to an “incorrect” interpretation of the federal standards.

“Essentially, the USDA admitted once again in its letter that the DHA additives should never have been allowed in organics, and then goes on to state that they have chosen not to take enforcement action at this time,” said Charlotte Vallaeys, Farm and Food Policy Analyst with The Cornucopia Institute. Read Full Article »

Bookmark and Share

Keep Questionable Synthetic Additives Out of Organics!

Monday, March 21st, 2011

Protect Babies’ and Children’s Health

March 21, 2011

In conventional foods, the government allows the use of toxic pesticides, genetically engineered crops, and novel synthetic additives that have not been tested for safety. As organic consumers, we say: “No thanks, we’d rather not be part of this huge uncontrolled experiment!”

Organic foods offer an alternative, but some pro-corporate members of the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB), the panel set up by Congress to advise the Secretary of Agriculture on organic standards, would like to open the door to all synthetic additives to be added freely to organic foods—as long as they have, theoretically, nutritional value.

Any “nutrient” synthetic additive that comes on the market would become fair game for organics, even those that have never before been part of the human food system, chemically extracted with toxic solvents, grown in genetically engineered feedstock, and otherwise produced in ways that would shock any organic consumer. Read Full Article »

Bookmark and Share

Farmers and Consumer Groups File Lawsuit Challenging Genetically Engineered Alfalfa Approval

Saturday, March 19th, 2011

“Roundup Ready” Alfalfa Will Increase Pesticide Use and Cause Grave
Harm to Environment and Organic Industry

USDA Failures Guarantee Transgenic Contamination, Creation of More Superweeds

Contact:

George Kimbrell, Center for Food Safety: (571) 527-8618
Paul Achitoff, Earthjustice: (808) 599-2436
Mark A. Kastel, Cornucopia: (farming/organic questions) (608)-625-2042

San Francisco, CA – Today, attorneys for the Center for Food Safety (CFS) and Earthjustice filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), arguing that the agency’s recent unrestricted approval of genetically engineered (GE), “Roundup Ready” Alfalfa was unlawful. The GE crop is engineered to be immune to the herbicide glyphosate, which Monsanto markets as Roundup. USDA data show that 93% of all the alfalfa planted by farmers in the U.S. is grown without the use of any herbicides. With the full deregulation of GE alfalfa, USDA estimates that up to 23 million more pounds of toxic herbicides will be released into the environment each year.

“USDA has once again failed to provide adequate oversight of a biotech crop,” said Andrew Kimbrell, Executive Director of the Center for Food Safety. “This reckless approval flies in the face of overwhelming evidence that GE alfalfa threatens the rights of farmers and consumers, as well as significant harm to the environment. APHIS has refused to apply and enforce the law and instead has chosen to bow to the wishes of the biotech industry.”

This is the second case challenging the legality of USDA’s handling of GE alfalfa. Read Full Article »

Bookmark and Share