Pregnant Women Who Eat Genetically Modified Foods Risk Endangering Their Unborn BabiesJanuary 12th, 2006
By Geoffrey Lean, Environment Editor
Women who eat GM foods while pregnant risk endangering their unborn
babies, startling new research suggests.
The study – carried out by a leading scientist at the Russian Academy
of Sciences – found that more than half of the offspring of rats fed
on modified soya died in the first three weeks of life, six times as
many as those born to mothers with normal diets. Six times as many
were also severely underweight.
The research – which is being prepared for publication – is just one
of a clutch of recent studies that are reviving fears that GM food
damages human health. Italian research has found that modified soya
affected the liver and pancreas of mice. Australia had to abandon a
decade-long attempt to develop modified peas when an official study
found they caused lung damage.
And last May this newspaper revealed a secret report by the biotech
giant Monsanto, which showed that rats fed a diet rich in GM corn had
smaller kidneys and higher blood cell counts, suggesting possible
damage to their immune systems, than those that ate a similar
The United Nation’s Food and Agriculture Organisation held a workshop
on the safety of genetically modified foods at its Rome headquarters
late last year. The workshop was addressed by scientists whose
research had raised concerns about health dangers. But the World Trade
Organisation is expected next month to support a bid by the Bush
administration to force European countries to accept GM foods.
The Russian research threatens to have an explosive effect on already
hostile public opinion. Carried out by Dr Irina Ermakova at the
Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of the
Russian Academy of Sciences, it is believed to be the first to look at
the effects of GM food on the unborn.
The scientist added flour from a GM soya bean – produced by Monsanto
to be resistant to its pesticide, Roundup – to the food of female
rats, starting two weeks before they conceived, continuing through
pregnancy, birth and nursing. Others were given non-GM soyaand a third
group was given no soya at all.
She found that 36 per cent of the young of the rats fed the modified
soya were severely underweight, compared to 6 per cent of the
offspring of the other groups. More alarmingly, a staggering 55.6 per
cent of those born to mothers on the GM diet perished within three
weeks of birth, compared to 9 per cent of the offspring of those fed
normal soya, and 6.8 per cent of the young of those given no soya at all.
“The morphology and biochemical structures of rats are very similar to
those of humans, and this makes the results very disturbing” said Dr
Ermakova. “They point to a risk for mothers and their babies.”
Environmentalists say that – while the results are preliminary – they
are potentially so serious that they must be followed up. The American
Academy of Environmental Medicine has asked the US National Institute
of Health to sponsor an immediate, independent follow-up.
The Monsanto soya is widely eaten by Americans. There is little of it,
or any GM crop, in British foods though it is imported to feed animals
farmed for meat.
Tony Coombes, director of corporate affairs for Monsanto UK, said:
“The overwhelming weight of evidence from published, peer-reviewed,
independently conducted scientific studies demonstrates that Roundup
Ready soy can be safely consumed by rats, as well as all other animal
What the experiment found
Russian scientists added flour made from a GM soya to the diet of
female rats two weeks before mating them, and continued feeding it to
them during pregnancy, birth and nursing. Others were give non-GM soya
or none at all. Six times as many of the offspring of those fed the
modified soya were severely underweight compared to those born to the
rats given normal diets. Within three weeks, 55.6 per cent of the
young of the mothers given the modified soya died, against 9 per cent
of the offspring of those fed the conventional soya.